Revealing In-Block Nestedness: detection and benchmarking

January 17, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Physical Review E

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Albert SolΓ©-Ribalta, Claudio J. Tessone, Manuel S. Mariani, Javier Borge-Holthoefer arXiv ID 1801.05620 Category physics.soc-ph Cross-listed cs.SI, physics.data-an Citations 33 Venue Physical Review E Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
As new instances of nested organization --beyond ecological networks-- are discovered, scholars are debating around the co-existence of two apparently incompatible macroscale architectures: nestedness and modularity. The discussion is far from being solved, mainly for two reasons. First, nestedness and modularity appear to emerge from two contradictory dynamics, cooperation and competition. Second, existing methods to assess the presence of nestedness and modularity are flawed when it comes to the evaluation of concurrently nested and modular structures. In this work, we tackle the latter problem, presenting the concept of \textit{in-block nestedness}, a structural property determining to what extent a network is composed of blocks whose internal connectivity exhibits nestedness. We then put forward a set of optimization methods that allow us to identify such organization successfully, both in synthetic and in a large number of real networks. These findings challenge our understanding of the topology of ecological and social systems, calling for new models to explain how such patterns emerge.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” physics.soc-ph

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Scale-free networks are rare

Anna D. Broido, Aaron Clauset

physics.soc-ph πŸ› Nat. Commun. πŸ“š 988 cites 8 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted