Faster Approximate(d) Text-to-Pattern L1 Distance

January 28, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors PrzemysΕ‚aw UznaΕ„ski arXiv ID 1801.09159 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The problem of finding \emph{distance} between \emph{pattern} of length $m$ and \emph{text} of length $n$ is a typical way of generalizing pattern matching to incorporate dissimilarity score. For both Hamming and $L_1$ distances only a super linear upper bound $\widetilde{O}(n\sqrt{m})$ are known, which prompts the question of relaxing the problem: either by asking for $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$ approximate distance (every distance is reported up to a multiplicative factor), or $k$-approximated distance (distances exceeding $k$ are reported as $\infty$). We focus on $L_1$ distance, for which we show new algorithms achieving complexities respectively $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-1} n)$ and $\widetilde{O}((m+k\sqrt{m}) \cdot n/m)$. This is a significant improvement upon previous algorithms with runtime $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2} n)$ of Lipsky and Porat [Algorithmica 2011] and $\widetilde{O}(n\sqrt{k})$ of Amir, Lipsky, Porat and Umanski [CPM 2005].
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted