A Machine Learning Approach to Air Traffic Route Choice Modelling
February 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rodrigo Marcos, Oliva GarcΓa-CantΓΊ, Ricardo Herranz
arXiv ID
1802.06588
Category
cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence
Citations
11
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management (ATFCM) is one of the constituent parts of Air Traffic Management (ATM). The goal of ATFCM is to make airport and airspace capacity meet traffic demand and, when capacity opportunities are exhausted, optimise traffic flows to meet the available capacity. One of the key enablers of ATFCM is the accurate estimation of future traffic demand. The available information (schedules, flight plans, etc.) and its associated level of uncertainty differ across the different ATFCM planning phases, leading to qualitative differences between the types of forecasting that are feasible at each time horizon. While abundant research has been conducted on tactical trajectory prediction (i.e., during the day of operations), trajectory prediction in the pre-tactical phase, when few or no flight plans are available, has received much less attention. As a consequence, the methods currently in use for pre-tactical traffic forecast are still rather rudimentary, often resulting in suboptimal ATFCM decision making. This paper proposes a machine learning approach for the prediction of airlines route choices between two airports as a function of route characteristics, such as flight efficiency, air navigation charges and expected level of congestion. Different predictive models based on multinomial logistic regression and decision trees are formulated and calibrated with historical traffic data, and a critical evaluation of each model is conducted. We analyse the predictive power of each model in terms of its ability to forecast traffic volumes at the level of charging zones, proving significant potential to enhance pre-tactical traffic forecast. We conclude by discussing the limitations and room for improvement of the proposed approach, as well as the future developments required to produce reliable traffic forecasts at a higher spatial and temporal resolution.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Artificial Intelligence
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted