Real World Evaluation of Approaches to Research Paper Recommendation

February 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Siddharth Dinesh arXiv ID 1802.06892 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 3 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this work, we have identified the need for choosing baseline approaches for research-paper recommendation systems. Following a literature survey of all research paper recommendation approaches described over the last four years, we framed criteria that makes for a well-rounded set of baselines. These are implemented on Mr. DLib a literature recommendation platform. User click data was collected as part of an ongoing experiment in collaboration with our partner Gesis. We reported the results from our evaluation for the experiments. We will be able to draw clearer conclusions as time passes. We find that a term based similarity search performs better than keyword based approaches. These results are a good starting point in finding performance improvements for related document searches.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted