Wireless Expanders

February 20, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shirel Attali, Merav Parter, David Peleg, Shay Solomon arXiv ID 1802.07177 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper introduces an extended notion of expansion suitable for radio networks. A graph $G=(V,E)$ is called an $(Ξ±_w, Ξ²_w)$-{wireless expander} if for every subset $S \subseteq V$ s.t. $|S|\leq Ξ±_w \cdot |V|$, there exists a subset $S'\subseteq S$ s.t. there are at least $Ξ²_w \cdot |S|$ vertices in $V\backslash S$ adjacent in $G$ to exactly one vertex in $S'$. The main question we ask is the following: to what extent are ordinary expanders also good {wireless} expanders? We answer this question in a nearly tight manner. On the positive side, we show that any $(Ξ±, Ξ²)$-expander with maximum degree $Ξ”$ and $Ξ²\geq 1/Ξ”$ is also a $(Ξ±_w, Ξ²_w)$ wireless expander for $Ξ²_w = Ξ©(Ξ²/ \log (2 \cdot \min\{Ξ”/ Ξ², Ξ”\cdot Ξ²\}))$. Thus the wireless expansion is smaller than the ordinary expansion by at most a factor logarithmic in $\min\{Ξ”/ Ξ², Ξ”\cdot Ξ²\}$, which depends on the graph \emph{average degree} rather than maximum degree; e.g., for low arboricity graphs, the wireless expansion matches the ordinary expansion up to a constant. We complement this positive result by presenting an explicit construction of a "bad" $(Ξ±, Ξ²)$-expander for which the wireless expansion is $Ξ²_w = O(Ξ²/ \log (2 \cdot \min\{Ξ”/ Ξ², Ξ”\cdot Ξ²\})$. We also analyze the theoretical properties of wireless expanders and their connection to unique neighbor expanders, and demonstrate their applicability: Our results yield improved bounds for the {spokesmen election problem} that was introduced in the seminal paper of Chlamtac and Weinstein (1991) to devise efficient broadcasting for multihop radio networks. Our negative result yields a significantly simpler proof than that from the seminal paper of Kushilevitz and Mansour (1998) for a lower bound on the broadcast time in radio networks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted