Clique-Based Lower Bounds for Parsing Tree-Adjoining Grammars

March 02, 2018 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Karl Bringmann, Philip Wellnitz arXiv ID 1803.00804 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 13 Venue Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Tree-adjoining grammars are a generalization of context-free grammars that are well suited to model human languages and are thus popular in computational linguistics. In the tree-adjoining grammar recognition problem, given a grammar $ฮ“$ and a string $s$ of length $n$, the task is to decide whether $s$ can be obtained from $ฮ“$. Rajasekaran and Yooseph's parser (JCSS'98) solves this problem in time $O(n^{2ฯ‰})$, where $ฯ‰< 2.373$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. The best algorithms avoiding fast matrix multiplication take time $O(n^6)$. The first evidence for hardness was given by Satta (J. Comp. Linguist.'94): For a more general parsing problem, any algorithm that avoids fast matrix multiplication and is significantly faster than $O(|ฮ“| n^6)$ in the case of $|ฮ“| = ฮ˜(n^{12})$ would imply a breakthrough for Boolean matrix multiplication. Following an approach by Abboud et al. (FOCS'15) for context-free grammar recognition, in this paper we resolve many of the disadvantages of the previous lower bound. We show that, even on constant-size grammars, any improvement on Rajasekaran and Yooseph's parser would imply a breakthrough for the $k$-Clique problem. This establishes tree-adjoining grammar parsing as a practically relevant problem with the unusual running time of $n^{2ฯ‰}$, up to lower order factors.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity