A review of possible effects of cognitive biases on the interpretation of rule-based machine learning models

April 09, 2018 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› Artificial Intelligence

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A review of possible effects of cognitive biases on the interpretation of rule-based machine learnin"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors TomΓ‘Ε‘ Kliegr, Ε tΔ›pΓ‘n BahnΓ­k, Johannes FΓΌrnkranz arXiv ID 1804.02969 Category stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat) Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 124 Venue Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 1 day ago
Abstract
While the interpretability of machine learning models is often equated with their mere syntactic comprehensibility, we think that interpretability goes beyond that, and that human interpretability should also be investigated from the point of view of cognitive science. The goal of this paper is to discuss to what extent cognitive biases may affect human understanding of interpretable machine learning models, in particular of logical rules discovered from data. Twenty cognitive biases are covered, as are possible debiasing techniques that can be adopted by designers of machine learning algorithms and software. Our review transfers results obtained in cognitive psychology to the domain of machine learning, aiming to bridge the current gap between these two areas. It needs to be followed by empirical studies specifically focused on the machine learning domain.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning (Stat)

πŸ›οΈ πŸ›οΈ Transcended

Layer Normalization

Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, Geoffrey E. Hinton

stat.ML πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 12.0K cites 9 years ago