Bipartitioning Problems on Graphs with Bounded Tree-Width

April 11, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors N. R. Aravind, Subrahmanyam Kalyanasundaram, Anjeneya Swami Kare arXiv ID 1804.04016 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
For an undirected graph G, we consider the following problems: given a fixed graph H, can we partition the vertices of G into two non-empty sets A and B such that neither the induced graph G[A] nor G[B] contain H (i) as a subgraph? (ii) as an induced subgraph? These problems are NP-complete and are expressible in monadic second order logic (MSOL). The MSOL formulation, together with Courcelle's theorem implies linear time solvability on graphs with bounded tree-width. This approach yields algorithms with running time f(|phi|, t) * n, where |phi| is the length of the MSOL formula, t is the tree-width of the graph and n is the number of vertices of the graph. The dependency of f(|phi|, t) on |phi| can be as bad as a tower of exponentials. In this paper, we present explicit combinatorial algorithms for these problems for graphs G whose tree-width is bounded. We obtain 2^{O(t^r)} * n time algorithms when H is any fixed graph of order r. In the special case when H = K_r, a complete graph on r vertices, we get an 2^{O(t+r \log t)} * n time algorithm. The techniques can be extended to provide FPT algorithms to determine the smallest number q such that V can be partitioned into q parts such that none of the parts have H as a subgraph (induced subgraph).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted