An explicit two-source extractor with min-entropy rate near 4/9

April 15, 2018 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Mathematika

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mark Lewko arXiv ID 1804.05451 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.IT Citations 20 Venue Mathematika Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
In 2005 Bourgain gave the first explicit construction of a two-source extractor family with min-entropy rate less than $1/2$. His approach combined Fourier analysis with innovative but inefficient tools from arithmetic combinatorics and yielded an unspecified min-entropy rate which was greater than $.499$. This remained essentially the state of the art until a 2015 breakthrough of Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman in which they gave an alternative approach which produced extractors with arbitrarily small min-entropy rate. In the current work, we revisit the Fourier analytic approach. We give an improved analysis of one of Bourgain's extractors which shows that it in fact extracts from sources with min-entropy rate near $\frac{21}{44} =.477\ldots$, moreover we construct a variant of this extractor which we show extracts from sources with min-entropy rate near $4/9 $ = $.444\ldots$. While this min-entropy rate is inferior to Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman's construction, our extractors have the advantage of exponential small error which is important in some applications. The key ingredient in these arguments is recent progress connected to the restriction theory of the finite field paraboloid by Rudnev and Shkredov. This in turn relies on a Rudnev's point-plane incidence estimate, which in turn relies on Kollรกr's generalization of the Guth-Katz incidence theorem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Combinatorics

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 94 cites 10 years ago