Online Non-Preemptive Scheduling to Minimize Weighted Flow-time on Unrelated Machines

April 23, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Giorgio Lucarelli, Benjamin Moseley, Nguyen Kim Thang, Abhinav Srivastav, Denis Trystram arXiv ID 1804.08317 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the online problem of scheduling independent jobs \emph{non-preemptively} so as to minimize the weighted flow-time on a set of unrelated machines. There has been a considerable amount of work on this problem in the preemptive setting where several competitive algorithms are known in the classical competitive model. %Using the speed augmentation model, Anand et al. showed that the greedy algorithm is $O\left(\frac{1}Ξ΅\right)$-competitive in the preemptive setting. In the non-preemptive setting, Lucarelli et al. showed that there exists a strong lower bound for minimizing weighted flow-time even on a single machine. However, the problem in the non-preemptive setting admits a strong lower bound. Recently, Lucarelli et al. presented an algorithm that achieves a $O\left(\frac{1}{Ξ΅^2}\right)$-competitive ratio when the algorithm is allowed to reject $Ξ΅$-fraction of total weight of jobs and $Ξ΅$-speed augmentation. They further showed that speed augmentation alone is insufficient to derive any competitive algorithm. An intriguing open question is whether there exists a scalable competitive algorithm that rejects a small fraction of total weights. In this paper, we affirmatively answer this question. Specifically, we show that there exists a $O\left(\frac{1}{Ξ΅^3}\right)$-competitive algorithm for minimizing weighted flow-time on a set of unrelated machine that rejects at most $O(Ξ΅)$-fraction of total weight of jobs. The design and analysis of the algorithm is based on the primal-dual technique. Our result asserts that alternative models beyond speed augmentation should be explored when designing online schedulers in the non-preemptive setting in an effort to find provably good algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted