Observability Analysis of Aided INS with Heterogeneous Features of Points, Lines and Planes
May 12, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on robotics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yulin Yang, Guoquan Huang
arXiv ID
1805.05876
Category
math.OC: Optimization & Control
Cross-listed
cs.RO
Citations
77
Venue
IEEE Transactions on robotics
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we perform a thorough observability analysis for linearized inertial navigation systems (INS) aided by exteroceptive range and/or bearing sensors (such as cameras, LiDAR and sonars) with different geometric features (points, lines and planes). While the observability of vision-aided INS (VINS) with point features has been extensively studied in the literature, we analytically show that the general aided INS with point features preserves the same observability property: that is, 4 unobservable directions, corresponding to the global yaw and the global position of the sensor platform. We further prove that there are at least 5 (and 7) unobservable directions for the linearized aided INS with a single line (and plane) feature; and, for the first time, analytically derive the unobservable subspace for the case of multiple lines/planes. Building upon this, we examine the system observability of the linearized aided INS with different combinations of points, lines and planes, and show that, in general, the system preserves at least 4 unobservable directions, while if global measurements are available, as expected, some unobservable directions diminish. In particular, when using plane features, we propose to use a minimal, closest point (CP) representation; and we also study in-depth the effects of 5 degenerate motions identified on observability. To numerically validate our analysis, we develop and evaluate both EKF-based visual-inertial SLAM and visual-inertial odometry (VIO) using heterogeneous geometric features in Monte Carlo simulations.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Optimization & Control
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programming
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learned Primal-dual Reconstruction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted