Evaluation of Static Analysis Tools for Finding Vulnerabilities in Java and C/C++ Source Code
May 23, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rahma Mahmood, Qusay H. Mahmoud
arXiv ID
1805.09040
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
36
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
It is quite common for security testing to be delayed until after the software has been developed, but vulnerabilities may get noticed throughout the implementation phase and the earlier they are discovered, the easier and cheaper it will be to fix them. Software development processes such as the secure software development lifecycle incorporates security at every stage of the design and development process. Static code scanning tools find vulnerabilities in code by highlighting potential security flaws and offer examples on how to resolve them, and some may even modify the code to remove the susceptibility. This paper compares static analysis tools for Java and C/C++ source code, and explores their pros and cons.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted