Fast Dynamic Programming on Graph Decompositions
June 05, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Johan M. M. van Rooij, Hans L. Bodlaender, Erik Jan van Leeuwen, Peter Rossmanith, Martin Vatshelle
arXiv ID
1806.01667
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
6
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we consider tree decompositions, branch decompositions, and clique decompositions. We improve the running time of dynamic programming algorithms on these graph decompositions for a large number of problems as a function of the treewidth, branchwidth, or cliquewidth, respectively. On tree decompositions of width $k$, we improve the running time for Dominating Set to $O(3^k)$. We generalise this result to $[Ο,Ο]$-domination problems with finite or cofinite $Ο$ and $Ο$. For these problems, we give $O(s^k)$-time algorithms, where $s$ is the number of `states' a vertex can have in a standard dynamic programming algorithm for such a problems. Furthermore, we give an $O(2^k)$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings in a graph, and generalise this to $O(2^k)$-time algorithms for many clique covering, packing, and partitioning problems. On branch decompositions of width $k$, we give an $O(3^{\fracΟ{2}k})$-time algorithm for Dominating Set, an $O(2^{\fracΟ{2}k})$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings, and $O(s^{\fracΟ{2}k})$-time algorithms for $[Ο,Ο]$-domination problems involving $s$ states with finite or cofinite $Ο$ and $Ο$. Finally, on clique decompositions of width $k$, we give $O(4^k)$-time algorithms for Dominating Set, Independent Dominating Set, and Total Dominating Set. The main techniques used in this paper are a generalisation of fast subset convolution, as introduced by BjΓΆrklund et al., now applied in the setting of graph decompositions and augmented such that multiple states and multiple ranks can be used. Recently, Lokshtanov et al. have shown that some of the algorithms obtained in this paper have running times in which the base in the exponents is optimal, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted