Fast Context-Annotated Classification of Different Types of Web Service Descriptions
May 31, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Serguei A. Mokhov, Joey Paquet, Arash Khodadadi
arXiv ID
1806.02374
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
In the recent rapid growth of web services, IoT, and cloud computing, many web services and APIs appeared on the web. With the failure of global UDDI registries, different service repositories started to appear, trying to list and categorize various types of web services for client applications' discover and use. In order to increase the effectiveness and speed up the task of finding compatible Web Services in the brokerage when performing service composition or suggesting Web Services to the requests, high-level functionality of the service needs to be determined. Due to the lack of structured support for specifying such functionality, classification of services into a set of abstract categories is necessary. We employ a wide range of Machine Learning and Signal Processing algorithms and techniques in order to find the highest precision achievable in the scope of this article for the fast classification of three type of service descriptions: WSDL, REST, and WADL. In addition, we complement our approach by showing the importance and effect of contextual information on the classification of the service descriptions and show that it improves the accuracy in 5 different categories of services.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted