Using routinely collected patient data to support clinical trials research in accountable care organizations
June 25, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Andrew J McMurry, Richen Zhang, Alex Foxman, Lawrence Reiter, Ronny Schnel, DeLeys Brandman
arXiv ID
1807.00668
Category
q-bio.QM
Cross-listed
cs.CY,
cs.IR
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Background: More than half (57%) of pharma clinical research spend is in support of clinical trials. One reason is that Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and HIPAA privacy rules often limit how broadly patient information can be shared, resulting in laborious human efforts to manually collect, de-identify, and summarize patient information for use in clinical studies. Purpose: Conduct feasibility study for a Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) clinical trial in an Accountable Care Organization. Measure prevalence of RA and related conditions matching study criteria. Evaluate automation of patient de-identification and summarization to support patient cohort development for clinical studies. Methods: Collect original clinical documentation directly from the provider EHR system and extract clinical concepts necessary for matching study criteria. Automatically de-identify Protected Health Information (PHI) protect patient privacy and promote sharing. Leverage existing physician expert knowledge sources to enable analysis of patient populations. Results: Prevalence of RA was four percent (4%) in the study population (mean age 53 years, 52% female, 48% male). Clinical documentation for 3500 patient were extracted from three (3) EHR systems. Grouped diagnosis codes revealed high prevalence of diabetes and diseases of the circulatory system, as expected. De-identification accurately removed 99% of PHI identifiers with 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Conclusions: Results suggest the approach can improve automation and accelerate planning and construction of new clinical studies in the ACO setting. De-identification accuracy was better than previously approved requirements defined by four (4) hospital Institutional Review Boards.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β q-bio.QM
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepConv-DTI: Prediction of drug-target interactions via deep learning with convolution on protein sequences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ProtVec: A Continuous Distributed Representation of Biological Sequences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Perspective on Deep Imaging
R.I.P.
π
404 Not Found
Deep learning in bioinformatics: introduction, application, and perspective in big data era
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Data-driven Advice for Applying Machine Learning to Bioinformatics Problems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted