Revisiting the Challenges of MaxClique

July 24, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Scientific Reports 2023

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Raffaele Marino, Scott Kirkpatrick arXiv ID 1807.09091 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue Scientific Reports 2023 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The MaxClique problem, finding the largest complete subgraph in an Erd{ΓΆ}s-R{Γ©}nyi $G(N,p)$ random graph in the large $N$ limit, is a well-known example of a simple problem for which finding any approximate solution within a factor of $2$ of the known, probabilistically determined limit, appears to require P$=$NP. This type of search has practical importance in very large graphs. Algorithmic approaches run into phase boundaries long before they reach the size of the largest likely solutions. And, most intriguing, there is an extensive literature of \textit{challenges} posed for concrete methods of finding maximum naturally occurring as well as artificially hidden cliques, with computational costs that are at most polynomial in the size of the problem. We use the probabilistic approach in a novel way to provide a more insightful test of constructive algorithms for this problem. We show that extensions of existing methods of greedy local search will be able to meet the \textit{challenges} for practical problems of size $N$ as large as $10^{10}$ and perhaps more. Experiments with spectral methods that treat a single large clique of size $Ξ±N^{1/2}$ \textit{planted} in the graph as an impurity level in a tight binding energy band show that such a clique can be detected when $Ξ±\geq \approx1.0$. Belief propagation using a recent \textit{approximate message passing} (\textbf{AMP}) scheme of inference pushes this limit down to $Ξ±\sim \sqrt{1/e}$. Exhaustive local search (with early stopping when the planted clique is found) does even better on problems of practical size, and proves to be the fastest solution method for this problem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted