Solving Target Set Selection with Bounded Thresholds Faster than $2^n$

July 27, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ivan Bliznets, Danil Sagunov arXiv ID 1807.10789 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we consider the Target Set Selection problem. The problem naturally arises in many fields like economy, sociology, medicine. In the Target Set Selection problem one is given a graph $G$ with a function $\operatorname{thr}: V(G) \to \mathbb{N} \cup \{0\}$ and integers $k, \ell$. The goal of the problem is to activate at most $k$ vertices initially so that at the end of the activation process there is at least $\ell$ activated vertices. The activation process occurs in the following way: (i) once activated, a vertex stays activated forever; (ii) vertex $v$ becomes activated if at least $\operatorname{thr}(v)$ of its neighbours are activated. The problem and its different special cases were extensively studied from approximation and parameterized points of view. For example, parameterizations by the following parameters were studied: treewidth, feedback vertex set, diameter, size of target set, vertex cover, cluster editing number and others. Despite the extensive study of the problem it is still unknown whether the problem can be solved in $\mathcal{O}^*((2-Ξ΅)^n)$ time for some $Ξ΅>0$. We partially answer this question by presenting several faster-than-trivial algorithms that work in cases of constant thresholds, constant dual thresholds or when the threshold value of each vertex is bounded by one-third of its degree. Also, we show that the problem parameterized by $\ell$ is W[1]-hard even when all thresholds are constant.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted