Regression adjustments for estimating the global treatment effect in experiments with interference
August 27, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of Causal Inference
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Alex Chin
arXiv ID
1808.08683
Category
stat.ME
Cross-listed
cs.SI
Citations
54
Venue
Journal of Causal Inference
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Standard estimators of the global average treatment effect can be biased in the presence of interference. This paper proposes regression adjustment estimators for removing bias due to interference in Bernoulli randomized experiments. We use a fitted model to predict the counterfactual outcomes of global control and global treatment. Our work differs from standard regression adjustments in that the adjustment variables are constructed from functions of the treatment assignment vector, and that we allow the researcher to use a collection of any functions correlated with the response, turning the problem of detecting interference into a feature engineering problem. We characterize the distribution of the proposed estimator in a linear model setting and connect the results to the standard theory of regression adjustments under SUTVA. We then propose an estimator that allows for flexible machine learning estimators to be used for fitting a nonlinear interference functional form. We propose conducting statistical inference via bootstrap and resampling methods, which allow us to sidestep the complicated dependences implied by interference and instead rely on empirical covariance structures. Such variance estimation relies on an exogeneity assumption akin to the standard unconfoundedness assumption invoked in observational studies. In simulation experiments, our methods are better at debiasing estimates than existing inverse propensity weighted estimators based on neighborhood exposure modeling. We use our method to reanalyze an experiment concerning weather insurance adoption conducted on a collection of villages in rural China.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β stat.ME
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Performance Metrics (Error Measures) in Machine Learning Regression, Forecasting and Prognostics: Properties and Typology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levels
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted