Univariate Ideal Membership Parameterized by Rank, Degree, and Number of Generators
August 31, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Theory of Computing Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
V. Arvind, Abhranil Chatterjee, Rajit Datta, Partha Mukhopadhyay
arXiv ID
1808.10787
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
2
Venue
Theory of Computing Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Let $\mathbb{F}[X]$ be the polynomial ring over the variables $X=\{x_1,x_2, \ldots, x_n\}$. An ideal $I=\langle p_1(x_1), \ldots, p_n(x_n)\rangle$ generated by univariate polynomials $\{p_i(x_i)\}_{i=1}^n$ is a \emph{univariate ideal}. We study the ideal membership problem for the univariate ideals and show the following results. \item Let $f(X)\in\mathbb{F}[\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_r]$ be a (low rank) polynomial given by an arithmetic circuit where $\ell_i : 1\leq i\leq r$ are linear forms, and $I=\langle p_1(x_1), \ldots, p_n(x_n)\rangle$ be a univariate ideal. Given $\vecΞ±\in {\mathbb{F}}^n$, the (unique) remainder $f(X) \pmod I$ can be evaluated at $\vecΞ±$ in deterministic time $d^{O(r)}\cdot poly(n)$, where $d=\max\{Β°(f),Β°(p_1)\ldots,Β°(p_n)\}$. This yields an $n^{O(r)}$ algorithm for minimum vertex cover in graphs with rank-$r$ adjacency matrices. It also yields an $n^{O(r)}$ algorithm for evaluating the permanent of a $n\times n$ matrix of rank $r$, over any field $\mathbb{F}$. Over $\mathbb{Q}$, an algorithm of similar run time for low rank permanent is due to Barvinok[Bar96] via a different technique. \item Let $f(X)\in\mathbb{F}[X]$ be given by an arithmetic circuit of degree $k$ ($k$ treated as fixed parameter) and $I=\langle p_1(x_1), \ldots, p_n(x_n)\rangle$. We show in the special case when $I=\langle x_1^{e_1}, \ldots, x_n^{e_n}\rangle$, we obtain a randomized $O^*(4.08^k)$ algorithm that uses $poly(n,k)$ space. \item Given $f(X)\in\mathbb{F}[X]$ by an arithmetic circuit and $I=\langle p_1(x_1), \ldots, p_k(x_k) \rangle$, membership testing is $W[1]$-hard, parameterized by $k$. The problem is $MINI[1]$-hard in the special case when $I=\langle x_1^{e_1}, \ldots, x_k^{e_k}\rangle$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted