Multitasking Capacity: Hardness Results and Improved Constructions

September 08, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Noga Alon, Jonathan D. Cohen, Thomas L. Griffiths, Pasin Manurangsi, Daniel Reichman, Igor Shinkar, Tal Wagner, Alexander Yu arXiv ID 1809.02835 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 3 Venue SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the problem of determining the maximal $Ξ±\in (0,1]$ such that every matching $M$ of size $k$ (or at most $k$) in a bipartite graph $G$ contains an induced matching of size at least $Ξ±|M|$. This measure was recently introduced in Alon et al. (NIPS 2018) and is motivated by connectionist models of cognition as well as modeling interference in wireless and communication networks. We prove various hardness results for computing $Ξ±$ either exactly or approximately. En route to our results, we also consider the maximum connected matching problem: determining the largest matching $N$ in a graph $G$ such that every two edges in $N$ are connected by an edge. We prove a nearly optimal $n^{1-Ξ΅}$ hardness of approximation result (under randomized reductions) for connected matching in bipartite graphs (with both sides of cardinality $n$). Towards this end we define bipartite half-covers: A new combinatorial object that may be of independent interest. To the best of our knowledge, the best previous hardness result for the connected matching problem was some constant $Ξ²>1$. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of bipartite graphs with $n$ vertices on each side of average degree $d$, that achieve $Ξ±=1/2-Ξ΅$ for matchings of size sufficiently smaller than $n/poly(d)$. This nearly matches the trivial upper bound of $1/2$ on $Ξ±$ which holds for any graph containing a path of length 3.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted