A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods

September 25, 2018 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› ACM Computing Surveys

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ruocheng Guo, Lu Cheng, Jundong Li, P. Richard Hahn, Huan Liu arXiv ID 1809.09337 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed stat.ME Citations 180 Venue ACM Computing Surveys Last Checked 1 day ago
Abstract
This work considers the question of how convenient access to copious data impacts our ability to learn causal effects and relations. In what ways is learning causality in the era of big data different from -- or the same as -- the traditional one? To answer this question, this survey provides a comprehensive and structured review of both traditional and frontier methods in learning causality and relations along with the connections between causality and machine learning. This work points out on a case-by-case basis how big data facilitates, complicates, or motivates each approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence