Simple and Fast Algorithms for Interactive Machine Learning with Random Counter-examples

October 01, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Journal of machine learning research

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jagdeep Bhatia arXiv ID 1810.00506 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed stat.ML Citations 1 Venue Journal of machine learning research Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This work describes simple and efficient algorithms for interactively learning non-binary concepts in the learning from random counter-examples (LRC) model. Here, learning takes place from random counter-examples that the learner receives in response to their proper equivalence queries. In this context, the learning time is defined as the number of counter-examples needed by the learner to identify the target concept. Such learning is particularly suited for online ranking, classification, clustering, etc., where machine learning models must be used before they are fully trained. We provide two simple LRC algorithms, deterministic and randomized, for exactly learning non-binary target concepts for any concept class $H$. We show that both of these algorithms have an $\mathcal{O}(\log{}|H|)$ asymptotically optimal average learning time. This solves an open problem on the existence of an efficient LRC randomized algorithm while simplifying and generalizing previous results. We also show that the expected learning time of any arbitrary LRC algorithm can be upper bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}ฮต\log{\frac{|H|}ฮด})$, where $ฮต$ and $ฮด$ are the allowed learning error and failure probability respectively. This shows that LRC interactive learning is at least as efficient as non-interactive Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning. Our simulations show that in practice, these algorithms outperform their theoretical bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted