On the Art and Science of Machine Learning Explanations
October 05, 2018 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (โฅ5 year threshold)"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Repo contents: .gitignore, ACM-Reference-Format.bst, README.md, acmart.cls, bibliography.bib, img, kdd_2019.bib, kdd_2019.pdf, kdd_2019.tex, main.pdf, main.tex
Authors
Patrick Hall
arXiv ID
1810.02909
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
32
Venue
arXiv.org
Repository
https://github.com/jphall663/kdd_2019
โญ 20
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
This text discusses several popular explanatory methods that go beyond the error measurements and plots traditionally used to assess machine learning models. Some of the explanatory methods are accepted tools of the trade while others are rigorously derived and backed by long-standing theory. The methods, decision tree surrogate models, individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), partial dependence plots, and Shapley explanations, vary in terms of scope, fidelity, and suitable application domain. Along with descriptions of these methods, this text presents real-world usage recommendations supported by a use case and public, in-depth software examples for reproducibility.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning (Stat)
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Layer Normalization
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
๐
๐
The Cartographer
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted