Leveraging Gaussian Process and Voting-Empowered Many-Objective Evaluation for Fault Identification

October 29, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Pei Cao, Qi Shuai, Jiong Tang arXiv ID 1810.12228 Category cs.CE: Computational Engineering Cross-listed cs.LG, stat.ML Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Using piezoelectric impedance/admittance sensing for structural health monitoring is promising, owing to the simplicity in circuitry design as well as the high-frequency interrogation capability. The actual identification of fault location and severity using impedance/admittance measurements, nevertheless, remains to be an extremely challenging task. A first-principle based structural model using finite element discretization requires high dimensionality to characterize the high-frequency response. As such, direct inversion using the sensitivity matrix usually yields an under-determined problem. Alternatively, the identification problem may be cast into an optimization framework in which fault parameters are identified through repeated forward finite element analysis which however is oftentimes computationally prohibitive. This paper presents an efficient data-assisted optimization approach for fault identification without using finite element model iteratively. We formulate a many-objective optimization problem to identify fault parameters, where response surfaces of impedance measurements are constructed through Gaussian process-based calibration. To balance between solution diversity and convergence, an -dominance enabled many-objective simulated annealing algorithm is established. As multiple solutions are expected, a voting score calculation procedure is developed to further identify those solutions that yield better implications regarding structural health condition. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by systematic numerical and experimental case studies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Engineering

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted