How to Improve Your Speaker Embeddings Extractor in Generic Toolkits

November 05, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hossein Zeinali, Lukas Burget, Johan Rohdin, Themos Stafylakis, Jan Cernocky arXiv ID 1811.02066 Category cs.SD: Sound Cross-listed cs.CL, eess.AS Citations 51 Venue IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Recently, speaker embeddings extracted with deep neural networks became the state-of-the-art method for speaker verification. In this paper we aim to facilitate its implementation on a more generic toolkit than Kaldi, which we anticipate to enable further improvements on the method. We examine several tricks in training, such as the effects of normalizing input features and pooled statistics, different methods for preventing overfitting as well as alternative non-linearities that can be used instead of Rectifier Linear Units. In addition, we investigate the difference in performance between TDNN and CNN, and between two types of attention mechanism. Experimental results on Speaker in the Wild, SRE 2016 and SRE 2018 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed implementation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Sound

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted