Minimizing and Computing the Inverse Geodesic Length on Trees
November 09, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Serge Gaspers, Joshua Lau
arXiv ID
1811.03836
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
2
Venue
International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
For any fixed measure $H$ that maps graphs to real numbers, the MinH problem is defined as follows: given a graph $G$, an integer $k$, and a target $Ο$, is there a set $S$ of $k$ vertices that can be deleted, so that $H(G - S)$ is at most $Ο$? In this paper, we consider the MinH problem on trees. We call $H$ "balanced on trees" if, whenever $G$ is a tree, there is an optimal choice of $S$ such that the components of $G-S$ have sizes bounded by a polynomial in $n/k$. We show that MinH on trees is FPT for parameter $n/k$, and furthermore, can be solved in subexponential time, and polynomial space, if $H$ is additive, balanced on trees, and computable in polynomial time. A measure of interest is the Inverse Geodesic Length (IGL), which is used to gauge the connectedness of a graph. It is defined as the sum of inverse distances between every two vertices: $IGL(G)=\sum_{\{u,v\} \subseteq V} \frac{1}{d_G(u,v)}$. While MinIGL is W[1]-hard for parameter treewidth, and cannot be solved in $2^{o(k+n+m)}$ time, even on bipartite graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, the complexity status of the problem remains open on trees. We show that IGL is balanced on trees, to give a $2^{O((n\log n)^{5/6})}$ time, polynomial space algorithm. The distance distribution of $G$ is the sequence $\{a_i\}$ describing the number of vertex pairs distance $i$ apart in $G$: $a_i=|\{\{u, v\}: d_G(u, v)=i\}|$. We show that the distance distribution of a tree can be computed in $O(n\log^2 n)$ time by reduction to polynomial multiplication. We extend our result to graphs with small treewidth by showing that the first $p$ values of the distance distribution can be computed in $2^{O(tw(G))} n^{1+\varepsilon} \sqrt{p}$ time, and the entire distance distribution can be computed in $2^{O(tw(G))} n^{1+\varepsilon}$ time, when the diameter of $G$ is $O(n^{\varepsilon'})$ for every $\varepsilon'>0$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted