Analysis of tagging latency when comparing event-related potentials

December 07, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors GrΓ©goire Cattan, Anton Andreev, Bastien Maureille, Marco Congedo arXiv ID 1812.03066 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.GR, eess.SY Citations 12 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Event-related potentials (ERPs) are very small voltage produced by the brain in response to external stimulation. In order to detect and evaluate an ERP in an ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG), it is necessary to tag the EEG with the exact onset time of the stimulus. We define the latency as the delay between the time the tagging command is sent and the detection of the stimulus on the screen. Failing to control sequencing in the tagging pipeline causes problems when interpreting latency, in particular when comparing ERPs generated from stimuli displayed by different systems. In this work, we present number of technical aspects which can influence latency such as the refresh rate of the screen or the display of a stimulus at different screen location. A few propositions are suggested to estimate and correct this latency.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted