Value of Information in Feedback Control: Quantification
December 18, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Touraj Soleymani, John S. Baras, Sandra Hirche
arXiv ID
1812.07534
Category
math.OC: Optimization & Control
Cross-listed
cs.IT
Citations
58
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Although transmission of a data packet containing sensory information in a networked control system improves the quality of regulation, it has indeed a price from the communication perspective. It is, therefore, rational that such a data packet be transmitted only if it is valuable in the sense of a cost-benefit analysis. Yet, the fact is that little is known so far about this valuation of information and its connection with traditional event-triggered communication. In the present article, we study this intrinsic property of networked control systems by formulating a rate-regulation tradeoff between the packet rate and the regulation cost with an event trigger and a controller as two distributed decision makers, and show that the valuation of information is conceivable and quantifiable grounded on this tradeoff. In particular, we characterize an equilibrium in the rate-regulation tradeoff, and quantify the value of information $\text{VoI}_k$ there as the variation in a so-called value function with respect to a piece of sensory information that can be communicated to the controller at each time $k$. We prove that, for a multi-dimensional Gauss-Markov process, $\text{VoI}_k$ is a symmetric function of the discrepancy between the state estimates at the event trigger and the controller, and that a data packet containing sensory information at time $k$ should be transmitted to the controller only if $\text{VoI}_k$ is nonnegative. Moreover, we discuss that $\text{VoI}_k$ can be computed with arbitrary accuracy, and that it can be approximated by a closed-form quadratic function with a performance guarantee.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Optimization & Control
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Little
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programming
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learned Primal-dual Reconstruction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted