Do we agree on user interface aesthetics of Android apps?

December 21, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christiane G. von Wangenheim, JoΓ£o V. Araujo Porto, Jean C. R. Hauck, Adriano F. Borgatto arXiv ID 1812.09049 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.HC Citations 15 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Context: Visual aesthetics is increasingly seen as an essential factor in perceived usability, interaction, and overall appraisal of user interfaces especially with respect to mobile applications. Yet, a question that remains is how to assess and to which extend users agree on visual aesthetics. Objective: This paper analyzes the inter-rater agreement on visual aesthetics of user interfaces of Android apps as a basis for guidelines and evaluation models. Method: We systematically collected ratings on the visual aesthetics of 100 user interfaces of Android apps from 10 participants and analyzed the frequency distribution, reliability and influencing design aspects. Results: In general, user interfaces of Android apps are perceived more ugly than beautiful. Yet, raters only moderately agree on the visual aesthetics. Disagreements seem to be related to subtle differences with respect to layout, shapes, colors, typography, and background images. Conclusion: Visual aesthetics is a key factor for the success of apps. However, the considerable disagreement of raters on the perceived visual aesthetics indicates the need for a better understanding of this software quality with respect to mobile apps.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted