A determinantal point process for column subset selection
December 23, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Journal of machine learning research
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ayoub Belhadji, Rรฉmi Bardenet, Pierre Chainais
arXiv ID
1812.09771
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
29
Venue
Journal of machine learning research
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Dimensionality reduction is a first step of many machine learning pipelines. Two popular approaches are principal component analysis, which projects onto a small number of well chosen but non-interpretable directions, and feature selection, which selects a small number of the original features. Feature selection can be abstracted as a numerical linear algebra problem called the column subset selection problem (CSSP). CSSP corresponds to selecting the best subset of columns of a matrix $X \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times d}$, where \emph{best} is often meant in the sense of minimizing the approximation error, i.e., the norm of the residual after projection of $X$ onto the space spanned by the selected columns. Such an optimization over subsets of $\{1,\dots,d\}$ is usually impractical. One workaround that has been vastly explored is to resort to polynomial-cost, random subset selection algorithms that favor small values of this approximation error. We propose such a randomized algorithm, based on sampling from a projection determinantal point process (DPP), a repulsive distribution over a fixed number $k$ of indices $\{1,\dots,d\}$ that favors diversity among the selected columns. We give bounds on the ratio of the expected approximation error for this DPP over the optimal error of PCA. These bounds improve over the state-of-the-art bounds of \emph{volume sampling} when some realistic structural assumptions are satisfied for $X$. Numerical experiments suggest that our bounds are tight, and that our algorithms have comparable performance with the \emph{double phase} algorithm, often considered to be the practical state-of-the-art. Column subset selection with DPPs thus inherits the best of both worlds: good empirical performance and tight error bounds.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning (Stat)
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Layer Normalization
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
๐
๐
The Cartographer
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted