BCI decoder performance comparison of an LSTM recurrent neural network and a Kalman filter in retrospective simulation

December 24, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tommy Hosman, Marco Vilela, Daniel Milstein, Jessica N. Kelemen, David M. Brandman, Leigh R. Hochberg, John D. Simeral arXiv ID 1812.09835 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 41 Venue International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Intracortical brain computer interfaces (iBCIs) using linear Kalman decoders have enabled individuals with paralysis to control a computer cursor for continuous point-and-click typing on a virtual keyboard, browsing the internet, and using familiar tablet apps. However, further advances are needed to deliver iBCI-enabled cursor control approaching able-bodied performance. Motivated by recent evidence that nonlinear recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can provide higher performance iBCI cursor control in nonhuman primates (NHPs), we evaluated decoding of intended cursor velocity from human motor cortical signals using a long-short term memory (LSTM) RNN trained across multiple days of multi-electrode recordings. Running simulations with previously recorded intracortical signals from three BrainGate iBCI trial participants, we demonstrate an RNN that can substantially increase bits-per-second metric in a high-speed cursor-based target selection task as well as a challenging small-target high-accuracy task when compared to a Kalman decoder. These results indicate that RNN decoding applied to human intracortical signals could achieve substantial performance advances in continuous 2-D cursor control and motivate a real-time RNN implementation for online evaluation by individuals with tetraplegia.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted