Hardware-Guided Symbiotic Training for Compact, Accurate, yet Execution-Efficient LSTM

January 30, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hongxu Yin, Guoyang Chen, Yingmin Li, Shuai Che, Weifeng Zhang, Niraj K. Jha arXiv ID 1901.10997 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 10 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many long short-term memory (LSTM) applications need fast yet compact models. Neural network compression approaches, such as the grow-and-prune paradigm, have proved to be promising for cutting down network complexity by skipping insignificant weights. However, current compression strategies are mostly hardware-agnostic and network complexity reduction does not always translate into execution efficiency. In this work, we propose a hardware-guided symbiotic training methodology for compact, accurate, yet execution-efficient inference models. It is based on our observation that hardware may introduce substantial non-monotonic behavior, which we call the latency hysteresis effect, when evaluating network size vs. inference latency. This observation raises question about the mainstream smaller-dimension-is-better compression strategy, which often leads to a sub-optimal model architecture. By leveraging the hardware-impacted hysteresis effect and sparsity, we are able to achieve the symbiosis of model compactness and accuracy with execution efficiency, thus reducing LSTM latency while increasing its accuracy. We have evaluated our algorithms on language modeling and speech recognition applications. Relative to the traditional stacked LSTM architecture obtained for the Penn Treebank dataset, we reduce the number of parameters by 18.0x (30.5x) and measured run-time latency by up to 2.4x (5.2x) on Nvidia GPUs (Intel Xeon CPUs) without any accuracy degradation. For the DeepSpeech2 architecture obtained for the AN4 dataset, we reduce the number of parameters by 7.0x (19.4x), word error rate from 12.9% to 9.9% (10.4%), and measured run-time latency by up to 1.7x (2.4x) on Nvidia GPUs (Intel Xeon CPUs). Thus, our method yields compact, accurate, yet execution-efficient inference models.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Neural & Evolutionary

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE ๐Ÿ› IEEE TNNLS ๐Ÿ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted