A Comparison of Information Retrieval Techniques for Detecting Source Code Plagiarism

February 06, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Vasishtha Sriram Jayapati, Ajay Venkitaraman arXiv ID 1902.02407 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Plagiarism is a commonly encountered problem in the academia. While there are several tools and techniques to efficiently determine plagiarism in text, the same cannot be said about source code plagiarism. To make the existing systems more efficient, we use several information retrieval techniques to find the similarity between source code files written in Java. We later use JPlag, which is a string-based plagiarism detection tool used in academia to match the plagiarized source codes. In this paper, we aim to generalize on the efficiency and effectiveness of detecting plagiarism using different information retrieval models rather than using just string manipulation algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted