Optimizing the SSD Burst Buffer by Traffic Detection
February 15, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xuanhua Shi, Wei Liu, Ligang He, Hai Jin, Ming Li, Yong Chen
arXiv ID
1902.05746
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Citations
16
Venue
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Currently, Burst buffer has been proposed to manage the SSD buffering of bursty write requests. Although burst buffer can improve I/O performance in many cases, we find that it has some limitations such as requiring large SSD capacity and harmonious overlapping between computation phase and data flushing phase. In this paper, we propose a scheme, called SSDUP+1. SSDUP+ aims to improve the burst buffer by addressing the above limitations. First, in order to reduce the demand for the SSD capacity, we develop a novel method to detect and quantify the data randomness in the write traffic. Further, an adaptive algorithm is proposed to classify the random writes dynamically. By doing so, much less SSD capacity is required to achieve the similar performance as other burst buffer schemes. Next, in order to overcome the difficulty of perfectly overlapping the computation phase and the flushing phase, we propose a pipeline mechanism for the SSD buffer, in which data buffering and flushing are performed in pipeline. In addition, in order to improve the I/O throughput, we adopt a traffic-aware flushing strategy to reduce the I/O interference in HDD. Finally, in order to further improve the performance of buffering random writes in SSD, SSDUP+ transforms the random writes to sequential writes in SSD by storing the data with a log structure. Further, SSDUP+ uses the AVL tree structure to store the sequence information of the data. We have implemented a prototype of SSDUP+ based on OrangeFS and conducted extensive experiments. The experimental results show that our proposed SSDUP+ can save an average of 50% SSD space, while delivering almost the same performance as other common burst buffer schemes. In addition, SSDUP+ can save about 20% SSD space compared with the previous version of this work, SSDUP, while achieving 20%-30% higher I/O throughput than SSDUP.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted