Automating the Diagram Method to Prove Correctness of Program Transformations

February 22, 2019 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› WPTE@FSCD

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors David Sabel arXiv ID 1902.08420 Category cs.LO: Logic in CS Cross-listed cs.PL Citations 2 Venue WPTE@FSCD Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We report on the automation of a technique to prove the correctness of program transformations in higher-order program calculi which may permit recursive let-bindings as they occur in functional programming languages. A program transformation is correct if it preserves the observational semantics of programs. In our LRSX Tool the so-called diagram method is automated by combining unification, matching, and reasoning on alpha-renamings on the higher-order meta-language, and automating induction proofs via an encoding into termination problems of term rewrite systems. We explain the techniques, we illustrate the usage of the tool, and we report on experiments.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Logic in CS