Parameterized k-Clustering: The distance matters!

February 22, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Fedor V. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach, Kirill Simonov arXiv ID 1902.08559 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the $k$-Clustering problem, which is for a given multiset of $n$ vectors $X\subset \mathbb{Z}^d$ and a nonnegative number $D$, to decide whether $X$ can be partitioned into $k$ clusters $C_1, \dots, C_k$ such that the cost \[\sum_{i=1}^k \min_{c_i\in \mathbb{R}^d}\sum_{x \in C_i} \|x-c_i\|_p^p \leq D,\] where $\|\cdot\|_p$ is the Minkowski ($L_p$) norm of order $p$. For $p=1$, $k$-Clustering is the well-known $k$-Median. For $p=2$, the case of the Euclidean distance, $k$-Clustering is $k$-Means. We show that the parameterized complexity of $k$-Clustering strongly depends on the distance order $p$. In particular, we prove that for every $p\in (0,1]$, $k$-Clustering is solvable in time $2^{O(D \log{D})} (nd)^{O(1)}$, and hence is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $D$. On the other hand, we prove that for distances of orders $p=0$ and $p=\infty$, no such algorithm exists, unless FPT=W[1].
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted