IVOA: Introspective Vision for Obstacle Avoidance

March 04, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sadegh Rabiee, Joydeep Biswas arXiv ID 1903.01028 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 25 Venue IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Vision, as an inexpensive yet information rich sensor, is commonly used for perception on autonomous mobile robots. Unfortunately, accurate vision-based perception requires a number of assumptions about the environment to hold -- some examples of such assumptions, depending on the perception algorithm at hand, include purely lambertian surfaces, texture-rich scenes, absence of aliasing features, and refractive surfaces. In this paper, we present an approach for introspective vision for obstacle avoidance (IVOA) -- by leveraging a supervisory sensor that is occasionally available, we detect failures of stereo vision-based perception from divergence in plans generated by vision and the supervisory sensor. By projecting the 3D coordinates where the plans agree and disagree onto the images used for vision-based perception, IVOA generates a training set of reliable and unreliable image patches for perception. We then use this training dataset to learn a model of which image patches are likely to cause failures of the vision-based perception algorithm. Using this model, IVOA is then able to predict whether the relevant image patches in the observed images are likely to cause failures due to vision (both false positives and false negatives). We empirically demonstrate with extensive real-world data from both indoor and outdoor environments, the ability of IVOA to accurately predict the failures of two distinct vision algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted