A New Lower Bound for Semigroup Orthogonal Range Searching

March 19, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Computational Geometry

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peyman Afshani arXiv ID 1903.07967 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 3 Venue International Symposium on Computational Geometry Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We report the first improvement in the space-time trade-off of lower bounds for the orthogonal range searching problem in the semigroup model, since Chazelle's result from 1990. This is one of the very fundamental problems in range searching with a long history. Previously, Andrew Yao's influential result had shown that the problem is already non-trivial in one dimension~\cite{Yao-1Dlb}: using $m$ units of space, the query time $Q(n)$ must be $Ξ©( Ξ±(m,n) + \frac{n}{m-n+1})$ where $Ξ±(\cdot,\cdot)$ is the inverse Ackermann's function, a very slowly growing function. In $d$ dimensions, Bernard Chazelle~\cite{Chazelle.LB.II} proved that the query time must be $Q(n) = Ξ©( (\log_Ξ²n)^{d-1})$ where $Ξ²= 2m/n$. Chazelle's lower bound is known to be tight for when space consumption is `high' i.e., $m = Ξ©(n \log^{d+\varepsilon}n)$. We have two main results. The first is a lower bound that shows Chazelle's lower bound was not tight for `low space': we prove that we must have $m (n) = Ξ©(n (\log n \log\log n)^{d-1})$. Our lower bound does not close the gap to the existing data structures, however, our second result is that our analysis is tight. Thus, we believe the gap is in fact natural since lower bounds are proven for idempotent semigroups while the data structures are built for general semigroups and thus they cannot assume (and use) the properties of an idempotent semigroup. As a result, we believe to close the gap one must study lower bounds for non-idempotent semigroups or building data structures for idempotent semigroups. We develope significantly new ideas for both of our results that could be useful in pursuing either of these directions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted