Trial of an AI: Empowering people to explore law and science challenges
March 05, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Gaudron Arthur
arXiv ID
1903.09518
Category
cs.OH: Other CS
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.CY
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence represents many things: a new market to conquer or a quality label for tech companies, a threat for traditional industries, a menace for democracy, or a blessing for our busy everyday life. The press abounds in examples illustrating these aspects, but one should draw not hasty and premature conclusions. The first successes in AI have been a surprise for society at large-including researchers in the field. Today, after the initial stupefaction, we have examples of the system reactions: traditional companies are heavily investing in AI, social platforms are monitored during elections, data collection is more and more regulated, etc. The resilience of an organization (i.e. its capacity to resist to a shock) relies deeply on the perception of its environment. Future problems have to be anticipated, while unforeseen events occurring have to be quickly identified in order to be mitigated as fast as possible. The author states that this clear perception starts with a common definition of AI in terms of capacities and limits. AI practitioners should make notions and concepts accessible to the general public and the impacted fields (e.g. industries, law, education). It is a truism that only law experts would have the potential to estimate IA impacts on judicial system. However, questions remain on how to connect different kind of expertise and what is the appropriate level of detail required for the knowledge exchanges. And the same consideration is true for dissemination towards society. Ultimately, society will live with decisions made by the "experts". It sounds wise to involve society in the decision process rather than risking to pay consequences later. Therefore, society also needs the key concepts to understand AI impact on their life. This was the purpose of the trial of an IA that took place in October 2018 at the Court of Appeal of Paris: gathering experts from various fields to expose challenges in law and science towards a general public.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Other CS
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
DeepPicar: A Low-cost Deep Neural Network-based Autonomous Car
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Governance by Glass-Box: Implementing Transparent Moral Bounds for AI Behaviour
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Pragmatic inference and visual abstraction enable contextual flexibility during visual communication
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Design and Implementation of a Novel Compatible Encoding Scheme in the Time Domain for Image Sensor Communication
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Detecting Plagiarism based on the Creation Process
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted