sharpDARTS: Faster and More Accurate Differentiable Architecture Search
March 23, 2019 · Declared Dead · 🏛 arXiv.org
"Paper promises code 'coming soon'"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Andrew Hundt, Varun Jain, Gregory D. Hager
arXiv ID
1903.09900
Category
cs.CV: Computer Vision
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG
Citations
69
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has been a source of dramatic improvements in neural network design, with recent results meeting or exceeding the performance of hand-tuned architectures. However, our understanding of how to represent the search space for neural net architectures and how to search that space efficiently are both still in their infancy. We have performed an in-depth analysis to identify limitations in a widely used search space and a recent architecture search method, Differentiable Architecture Search (DARTS). These findings led us to introduce novel network blocks with a more general, balanced, and consistent design; a better-optimized Cosine Power Annealing learning rate schedule; and other improvements. Our resulting sharpDARTS search is 50% faster with a 20-30% relative improvement in final model error on CIFAR-10 when compared to DARTS. Our best single model run has 1.93% (1.98+/-0.07) validation error on CIFAR-10 and 5.5% error (5.8+/-0.3) on the recently released CIFAR-10.1 test set. To our knowledge, both are state of the art for models of similar size. This model also generalizes competitively to ImageNet at 25.1% top-1 (7.8% top-5) error. We found improvements for existing search spaces but does DARTS generalize to new domains? We propose Differentiable Hyperparameter Grid Search and the HyperCuboid search space, which are representations designed to leverage DARTS for more general parameter optimization. Here we find that DARTS fails to generalize when compared against a human's one shot choice of models. We look back to the DARTS and sharpDARTS search spaces to understand why, and an ablation study reveals an unusual generalization gap. We finally propose Max-W regularization to solve this problem, which proves significantly better than the handmade design. Code will be made available.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
📜 Similar Papers
In the same crypt — Computer Vision
🌅
🌅
Old Age
🌅
🌅
Old Age
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
🌅
🌅
Old Age
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
🌅
🌅
Old Age
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Died the same way — ⏳ Coming Soon™
R.I.P.
⏳
Coming Soon™
Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning
R.I.P.
⏳
Coming Soon™
An Analysis of Scale Invariance in Object Detection - SNIP
R.I.P.
⏳
Coming Soon™
Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detection
R.I.P.
⏳
Coming Soon™