Graded Relevance Assessments and Graded Relevance Measures of NTCIR: A Survey of the First Twenty Years
March 27, 2019 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Graded Relevance Assessments and Graded Relevance Measures of NTCIR: A Survey of the First Twenty Ye"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Tetsuya Sakai
arXiv ID
1903.11272
Category
cs.IR: Information Retrieval
Citations
4
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 days ago
Abstract
NTCIR was the first large-scale IR evaluation conference to construct test collections with graded relevance assessments: the NTCIR-1 test collections from 1998 already featured relevant and partially relevant documents. In this paper, I first describe a few graded-relevance measures that originated from NTCIR (and a few variants) which are used across different NTCIR tasks. I then provide a survey on the use of graded relevance assessments and of graded relevance measures in the past NTCIR tasks which primarily tackled ranked retrieval. My survey shows that the majority of the past tasks fully utilised graded relevance by means of graded evaluation measures, but not all of them; interestingly, even a few relatively recent tasks chose to adhere to binary relevance measures. I conclude this paper by a summary of my survey in table form, and a brief discussion on what may lie beyond graded relevance.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Information Retrieval
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
๐
๐
Old Age
Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer
R.I.P.
๐
404 Not Found
Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted