Approximation algorithms and an integer program for multi-level graph spanners

April 01, 2019 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Analysis of Experimental Algorithms - Special Event

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Reyan Ahmed, Keaton Hamm, Mohammad Javad Latifi Jebelli, Stephen Kobourov, Faryad Darabi Sahneh, Richard Spence arXiv ID 1904.01135 Category cs.DM: Discrete Mathematics Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 10 Venue Analysis of Experimental Algorithms - Special Event Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Given a weighted graph $G(V,E)$ and $t \ge 1$, a subgraph $H$ is a \emph{$t$--spanner} of $G$ if the lengths of shortest paths in $G$ are preserved in $H$ up to a multiplicative factor of $t$. The \emph{subsetwise spanner} problem aims to preserve distances in $G$ for only a subset of the vertices. We generalize the minimum-cost subsetwise spanner problem to one where vertices appear on multiple levels, which we call the \emph{multi-level graph spanner} (MLGS) problem, and describe two simple heuristics. Applications of this problem include road/network building and multi-level graph visualization, especially where vertices may require different grades of service. We formulate a 0--1 integer linear program (ILP) of size $O(|E||V|^2)$ for the more general minimum \emph{pairwise spanner problem}, which resolves an open question by Sigurd and Zachariasen on whether this problem admits a useful polynomial-size ILP. We extend this ILP formulation to the MLGS problem, and evaluate the heuristic and ILP performance on random graphs of up to 100 vertices and 500 edges.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Discrete Mathematics