Subsets and Supermajorities: Optimal Hashing-based Set Similarity Search

April 08, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Thomas Dybdahl Ahle, Jakob Bæk Tejs Knudsen arXiv ID 1904.04045 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CG, cs.DB Citations 0 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We formulate and optimally solve a new generalized Set Similarity Search problem, which assumes the size of the database and query sets are known in advance. By creating polylog copies of our data-structure, we optimally solve any symmetric Approximate Set Similarity Search problem, including approximate versions of Subset Search, Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS), Jaccard Similarity Search and Partial Match. Our algorithm can be seen as a natural generalization of previous work on Set as well as Euclidean Similarity Search, but conceptually it differs by optimally exploiting the information present in the sets as well as their complements, and doing so asymmetrically between queries and stored sets. Doing so we improve upon the best previous work: MinHash [J. Discrete Algorithms 1998], SimHash [STOC 2002], Spherical LSF [SODA 2016, 2017] and Chosen Path [STOC 2017] by as much as a factor $n^{0.14}$ in both time and space; or in the near-constant time regime, in space, by an arbitrarily large polynomial factor. Turning the geometric concept, based on Boolean supermajority functions, into a practical algorithm requires ideas from branching random walks on $\mathbb Z^2$, for which we give the first non-asymptotic near tight analysis. Our lower bounds follow from new hypercontractive arguments, which can be seen as characterizing the exact family of similarity search problems for which supermajorities are optimal. The optimality holds for among all hashing based data structures in the random setting, and by reductions, for 1 cell and 2 cell probe data structures. As a side effect, we obtain new hypercontractive bounds on the directed noise operator $T^{p_1 \to p_2}_ρ$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted