The Complexity of Subtree Intersection Representation of Chordal Graphs and Linear Time Chordal Graph Generation
April 09, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of combinatorial optimization
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
TΔ±naz Ekim, Mordechai Shalom, Oylum Εeker
arXiv ID
1904.04916
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC
Citations
3
Venue
Journal of combinatorial optimization
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
It is known that any chordal graph on $n$ vertices can be represented as the intersection of $n$ subtrees in a tree on $n$ nodes. This fact is recently used in [2] to generate random chordal graphs on $n$ vertices by generating $n$ subtrees of a tree on $n$ nodes. It follows that the space (and thus time) complexity of such an algorithm is at least the sum of the sizes of the generated subtrees assuming that a tree is given by a set of nodes. In [2], this complexity was mistakenly claimed to be linear in the number $m$ of edges of the generated chordal graph. This error is corrected in [3] where the space complexity is shown to be $Ξ©(m n^{1/4})$. The exact complexity of the algorithm is left as an open question. In this paper, we show that the sum of the sizes of $n$ subtrees in a tree on $n$ nodes is $Ξ(m\sqrt{n})$. We also show that we can confine ourselves to contraction-minimal subtree intersection representations since they are sufficient to generate every chordal graph. Furthermore, the sum of the sizes of the subtrees in such a representation is at most $2m+n$. We use this result to derive the first linear time random chordal graph generator. Based on contraction-minimal representations, we also derive structural properties of chordal graphs related to their connectivity. In addition to these theoretical results, we conduct experiments to study the quality of the chordal graphs generated by our algorithm and compare them to those in the literature. Our experimental study indicates that the generated graphs do not have a restricted structure and the sizes of maximal cliques are distributed fairly over the range. Furthermore, our algorithm is simple to implement and produces graphs with 10000 vertices and $4 . 10^7$ edges in less than one second on a laptop computer.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted