Finding a latent k-simplex in O(k . nnz(data)) time via Subset Smoothing

April 14, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Ravindran Kannan arXiv ID 1904.06738 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.DS, stat.ML Citations 9 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we show that a large class of Latent variable models, such as Mixed Membership Stochastic Block(MMSB) Models, Topic Models, and Adversarial Clustering, can be unified through a geometric perspective, replacing model specific assumptions and algorithms for individual models. The geometric perspective leads to the formulation: \emph{find a latent $k-$ polytope $K$ in ${\bf R}^d$ given $n$ data points, each obtained by perturbing a latent point in $K$}. This problem does not seem to have been considered in the literature. The most important contribution of this paper is to show that the latent $k-$polytope problem admits an efficient algorithm under deterministic assumptions which naturally hold in Latent variable models considered in this paper. ur algorithm runs in time $O^*(k\; \mbox{nnz})$ matching the best running time of algorithms in special cases considered here and is better when the data is sparse, as is the case in applications. An important novelty of the algorithm is the introduction of \emph{subset smoothed polytope}, $K'$, the convex hull of the ${n\choose ฮดn}$ points obtained by averaging all $ฮดn$ subsets of the data points, for a given $ฮด\in (0,1)$. We show that $K$ and $K'$ are close in Hausdroff distance. Among the consequences of our algorithm are the following: (a) MMSB Models and Topic Models: the first quasi-input-sparsity time algorithm for parameter estimation for $k \in O^*(1)$, (b) Adversarial Clustering: In $k-$means, if, an adversary is allowed to move many data points from each cluster an arbitrary amount towards the convex hull of the centers of other clusters, our algorithm still estimates cluster centers well.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted