Improved Distributed Expander Decomposition and Nearly Optimal Triangle Enumeration
April 17, 2019 · Declared Dead · 🏛 ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yi-Jun Chang, Thatchaphol Saranurak
arXiv ID
1904.08037
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
54
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
An $(ε,φ)$-expander decomposition of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a clustering of the vertices $V=V_{1}\cup\cdots\cup V_{x}$ such that (1) each cluster $V_{i}$ induces subgraph with conductance at least $φ$, and (2) the number of inter-cluster edges is at most $ε|E|$. In this paper, we give an improved distributed expander decomposition. Specifically, we construct an $(ε,φ)$-expander decomposition with $φ=(ε/\log n)^{2^{O(k)}}$ in $O(n^{2/k}\cdot\text{poly}(1/φ,\log n))$ rounds for any $ε\in(0,1)$ and positive integer $k$. For example, a $(0.01,1/\text{poly}\log n)$-expander decomposition can be computed in $O(n^γ)$ rounds, for any arbitrarily small constant $γ>0$. Previously, the algorithm by Chang, Pettie, and Zhang can construct a $(1/6,1/\text{poly}\log n)$-expander decomposition using $\tilde{O}(n^{1-δ})$ rounds for any $δ>0$, with a caveat that the algorithm is allowed to throw away a set of edges into an extra part which forms a subgraph with arboricity at most $n^δ$. Our algorithm does not have this caveat. By slightly modifying the distributed algorithm for routing on expanders by Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su [PODC'17], we obtain a triangle enumeration algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n^{1/3})$ rounds. This matches the lower bound by Izumi and Le Gall [PODC'17] and Pandurangan, Robinson and Scquizzato [SPAA'18] of $\tildeΩ(n^{1/3})$ which holds even in the CONGESTED CLIQUE model. This provides the first non-trivial example for a distributed problem that has essentially the same complexity (up to a polylogarithmic factor) in both CONGEST and CONGESTED CLIQUE. The key technique in our proof is the first distributed approximation algorithm for finding a low conductance cut that is as balanced as possible. Previous distributed sparse cut algorithms do not have this nearly most balanced guarantee.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
📜 Similar Papers
In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms
📚
📚
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
📚
📚
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted