IRONHIDE: A Secure Multicore that Efficiently Mitigates Microarchitecture State Attacks for Interactive Applications
April 29, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hamza Omar, Omer Khan
arXiv ID
1904.12729
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.AR
Citations
27
Venue
International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Microprocessors enable aggressive hardware virtualization by means of which multiple processes temporally execute on the system. These security-critical and ordinary processes interact with each other to assure application progress. However, temporal sharing of hardware resources exposes the processor to various microarchitecture state attacks. State-of-the-art secure processors, such as MI6 adopt Intel's SGX enclave execution model. MI6 architects strong isolation by statically isolating shared memory state, and purging the microarchitecture state of private core, cache, and TLB resources on every enclave entry and exit. The purging overhead significantly impacts performance as the interactivity across the secure and insecure processes increases. This paper proposes IRONHIDE that implements strong isolation in the context of multicores to form spatially isolated secure and insecure clusters of cores. For an interactive application comprising of secure and insecure processes, IRONHIDE pins the secure process(es) to the secure cluster, where they execute and interact with the insecure process(es) without incurring the microarchitecture state purging overheads on every interaction event. IRONHIDE improves performance by 2.1x over the MI6 baseline for a set of user and OS interactive applications. Moreover, IRONHIDE improves performance by 20% over an SGX-like baseline, while also ensuring strong isolation guarantees against microarchitecture state attacks.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted