A Survey of Moving Target Defenses for Network Security
May 02, 2019 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐ IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Survey of Moving Target Defenses for Network Security"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sailik Sengupta, Ankur Chowdhary, Abdulhakim Sabur, Adel Alshamrani, Dijiang Huang, Subbarao Kambhampati
arXiv ID
1905.00964
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.NI
Citations
203
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
Last Checked
1 day ago
Abstract
Network defenses based on traditional tools, techniques, and procedures fail to account for the attacker's inherent advantage present due to the static nature of network services and configurations. To take away this asymmetric advantage, Moving Target Defense (MTD) continuously shifts the configuration of the underlying system, in turn reducing the success rate of cyberattacks. In this survey, we analyze the recent advancements made in the development of MTDs and define categorizations that capture the key aspects of such defenses. We first categorize these defenses into different sub-classes depending on what they move, when they move and how they move. In trying to answer the latter question, we showcase the use of domain knowledge and game-theoretic modeling can help the defender come up with effective and efficient movement strategies. Second, to understand the practicality of these defense methods, we discuss how various MTDs have been implemented and find that networking technologies such as Software Defined Networking and Network Function Virtualization act as key enablers for implementing these dynamic defenses. We then briefly highlight MTD test-beds and case-studies to aid readers who want to examine or deploy existing MTD techniques. Third, our survey categorizes proposed MTDs based on the qualitative and quantitative metrics they utilize to evaluate their effectiveness in terms of security and performance. We use well-defined metrics such as risk analysis and performance costs for qualitative evaluation and metrics based on Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability (CIA), attack representation, QoS impact, and targeted threat models for quantitative evaluation. Finally, we show that our categorization of MTDs is effective in identifying novel research areas and highlight directions for future research.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted