Analyzing Code Comments to Boost Program Comprehension

May 06, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yusuke Shinyama, Yoshitaka Arahori, Katsuhiko Gondow arXiv ID 1905.02050 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 31 Venue Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We are trying to find source code comments that help programmers understand a nontrivial part of source code. One of such examples would be explaining to assign a zero as a way to "clear" a buffer. Such comments are invaluable to programmers and identifying them correctly would be of great help. Toward this goal, we developed a method to discover explanatory code comments in a source code. We first propose eleven distinct categories of code comments. We then developed a decision-tree based classifier that can identify explanatory comments with 60% precision and 80% recall. We analyzed 2,000 GitHub projects that are written in two languages: Java and Python. This task is novel in that it focuses on a microscopic comment ("local comment") within a method or function, in contrast to the prior efforts that focused on API- or method-level comments. We also investigated how different category of comments is used in different projects. Our key finding is that there are two dominant types of comments: preconditional and postconditional. Our findings also suggest that many English code comments have a certain grammatical structure that are consistent across different projects.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted