Practical Algebraic Attack on DAGS
May 09, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Workshop on Code-Based Cryptography
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Magali Bardet, Manon Bertin, Alain Couvreur, Ayoub Otmani
arXiv ID
1905.03635
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.IT
Citations
5
Venue
International Workshop on Code-Based Cryptography
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
DAGS scheme is a key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) based on quasi-dyadic alternant codes that was submitted to NIST standardization process for a quantum resistant public key algorithm. Recently an algebraic attack was devised by Barelli and Couvreur (Asiacrypt 2018) that efficiently recovers the private key. It shows that DAGS can be totally cryptanalysed by solving a system of bilinear polynomial equations. However, some sets of DAGS parameters were not broken in practice. In this paper we improve the algebraic attack by showing that the original approach was not optimal in terms of the ratio of the number of equations to the number of variables. Contrary to the common belief that reducing at any cost the number of variables in a polynomial system is always beneficial, we actually observed that, provided that the ratio is increased and up to a threshold, the solving can be heavily improved by adding variables to the polynomial system. This enables us to recover the private keys in a few seconds. Furthermore, our experimentations also show that the maximum degree reached during the computation of the GrΓΆbner basis is an important parameter that explains the efficiency of the attack. Finally, the authors of DAGS updated the parameters to take into account the algebraic cryptanalysis of Barelli and Couvreur. In the present article, we propose a hybrid approach that performs an exhaustive search on some variables and computes a GrΓΆbner basis on the polynomial system involving the remaining variables. We then show that the updated set of parameters corresponding to 128-bit security can be broken with 2^83 operations.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted